That’s right. That’s what the title says. And that’s what the italicized text below describe. For those who think I’m too detailed and don’t look at the big picture, it’s because they only see me where I have to be the one to make things happen, and you can’t do that without details. You can’t build a car on concepts and vague ideas, in other words. For them, this should eliminate any of that. Fixing the economy, a huge problem, really only comes down to the 300 words below, which I could summarize in a sentence if I need to. For this, I’m sure many of these people who think I’m too much in the details will claim I’m naive. But you know what? I’ve gone through and grilled myself on the details of all this, what it would take to make it happen, and I’ve not been able to convince myself otherwise in the few years I’ve thought about this. If they really thought I were naive, I’ve got two words for them. Bring it! Try to win an argument against me on it! Otherwise, enjoy and let me know your thoughts if you were up to it!
Capitalism is obviously broken. It’s a competitive system, which explains why our competitive species likes it. That’s as long as we didn’t mind most people doing poorly, because in capitalism, we most often improve at the expense of others’ progress, not independently or all together. That’s why capitalism’s disruption must be applied here.
In life, we have needs and wants. Needs for survival. Wants for thriving. What falls into which category depends on how we define “survival”. Does “survival” mean something like being alive biologically, almost dead from starvation? Or does it mean something more humane, like having a place to call home, sufficient decent food, universal healthcare, utility internet access, and some free post-secondary education, to give everyone a reasonable shot at thriving? Currently, the global “survival” standard average is closer to animalistic than humanistic, leaving us lots of room to improve.
To improve the “survival” standard, we must expand its definition to include all practical needs, and increase the minimum thresholds of most needs provided, to give everyone a realistic chance to thrive in today’s world. Ban profit for items of need, or subsidize them with profits from luxury versions of these items. The rest, which is the vast majority of life and the economy, we can leave to capitalism as we know it.
Like it or not, government is who must disrupt capitalism to reset it. Sometimes, government will have provide these items of need themselves. Other times, government will have to require providers, or partner with providers, to do so. Of course, this will all be extremely challenging. However, given all the drastically unfair laws and policies enacted for centuries, often by a population minority, to enact just as drastically fairer laws and policies for humanity’s improvement, backed by an overwhelming majority, should be comparatively easy.
This was also an entry into a micro writing contest of 300 words or fewer. I think they were looking for stories, not visionary big picture outlooks. All the finalists were that, and my other entries were that. Regardless, this one didn’t make the short list so I am now free to share it. It could also have been because I thought the rules said 300 words rather than 300 words including the title. I don’t know what foolishness that was about but my bad that I didn’t catch that for this or a few of my other three entries, which I will save for other contests since they didn’t get a fair chance at it in this one.