Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Assessment

The Positive And Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) gives you an idea of your natural mix of happiness and unhappiness by measuring one’s general levels of positive and negative mood — or affect — and whether you tend to experience higher or lower positive and negative emotional states than average. There is neither “right” or “wrong” outcome, nor “best” or “worse”. Each outcome has its advantages and drawbacks. Knowing your mix will allow you, if you so choose, to best use it for effect and impact pending a situation and the way you tend to be.

To take the assessment, find a time when you feel relatively neutral about life, and not when you are more stressed or happy than normal. Then answer 20 questions about how deeply you feel a series of emotions.

Answer in general, or on average not at this very moment. Use the text below or this PDF if you’d like to do it on a printout.

 

You have five possible answers for each emotion:

  • 1 = very slightly or not at all
  • 2 = a little
  • 3 = moderately
  • 4 = quite a bit
  • 5 = extremely

 

Assign the scores above to the following 20 emotions:

1. Interested _______

2. Distressed _______

3. Excited _______

4. Upset _______

5. Strong _______

6. Guilty _______

7. Scared _______

8. Hostile _______

9. Enthusiastic _______

10. Proud _______

11. Irritable _______

12. Alert _______

13. Ashamed _______

14. Inspired _______

15. Nervous _______

16. Determined _______

17. Attentive _______

18. Jittery _______

19. Active _______

20. Afraid _______

 

 

Tallying results

  • Calculate your positive affect by summing your scores for questions 1, 3, 5, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, 17, and 19.
  • Calculate your negative affect by summing your scores for questions 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 11, 13, 15, 18, and 20.

 

Which PANAS type are you?

Remember, there is neither “right” or “wrong” outcome, nor “best” or “worse”. Each outcome has its advantages and drawbacks. Knowing your mix will allow you, if you so choose, to best use it for effect and impact pending a situation and the way you tend to be.

Unless you are the highly unusual person who is right at the average on both positive (33.3) and negative (about 17.4), you will fall into one of four quadrants.

  1. If you have above-average positive affect (>33.3) and above-average negative affect (>17.4),
    you’re a “Mad Scientist” who is always spun up about something.
  2. If you’re above-average positive (>33.3) and below-average negative (<17.4),
    you’re a “Cheerleader” who celebrate the good in everything and don’t dwell on the bad.
  3. If you’re below-average positive (<33.3) and above-average negative (>17.4),
    you’re a “Poet” who has trouble enjoying good things, but know when there’s a threat lurking.
  4. If you’re below-average positive (< 33.3) and below-average negative (<17.4),
    you’re a “Judge” who is sober and cool about everything.

 

Further interpreting the results

While there is no “best” or “worst”, “good” or “bad”, “right” or “wrong” PANAS type to be, you may doubt that or wish you were another type you perceive to be “better”. There is no easy way to possibly convince you otherwise, but perhaps an example of why it is bad if everyone were each type would convince you why all four types are needed, and quite possibly equally.

  • If everyone were a Cheerleader and only saw the bright side of everything, we’d keep making the same mistakes repeatedly, which would be awful.
  • Judges, meanwhile, keep us safe from what unrestrained and endless impulsivity may sometimes, or ultimately, lead to.
  • Poets keep us alert to threats, even if everything might seem like a threat at times when some aren’t and would just slow down progress or prevent it all together.
  • Finally, Mad Scientists keep life interesting by making everything grandiose, good and bad, when a lot, if not most things, clearly aren’t.

Every PANAS type has its advantages and disadvantages for all and each situation. Part of knowing your PANAS type is to know where you might fit best or be able to use your PANAS strengths best, and to avoid circumstances where your PANAS type isn’t naturally suited as it’d be more work, and more risk of negative outcomes, to achieve the level of goodness for outcomes in circumstances where your PANAS type belongs more naturally.

 

More information

You can find more information on the PANAS, outcomes, meaning, and use, on these sites and pages within them:

Pursuing Contentment Instead of Happiness

https://digitalcitizen.ca/category/writing/Over the past handful of years, I have been talking and reveling a lot about the science of happiness, and my happiness from having learned that science through courses at Yale and Berkeley online. I do this enough that there’s even a header menu choice for “happiness” on my blog, even though there’s not a huge number of posts under it. That’s how much I value trying to catch people’s attention with it to share it with them! For all of its value and my intent, though, I find that talking about the science and pursuit of happiness in life occasionally rubs people the wrong way, or lead them to think I’m really misguided since I’d never be happy if I’m always chasing something I can’t get, right? Yes, except that I’m really working to maintain as much of something as I can, though that wasn’t quite right, either. I am not trying to be ecstatic or even perky sort of happy throughout most of my days, which is not what the courses taught, either. I am just pursuing a general feeling of bliss throughout as much for as many of my days as possible, and minimizing stresses and/or things that get me down, stressful or not. But how to properly explain that? Well, recently, the Greater Good Science Center at UC Berkeley which had taught me the Science of Happiness course came to the rescue. Contentment, was the word I was seeking and meaning to use, not happiness, and it makes a huge world of difference!

Continue reading

Donating some Shopping Savings as “Random” Acts of Kindness

In some places, you can find people asking for money outside of stores, including grocery stores. Halifax is one of them. I’m not a fan of giving them money, to be honest, because I am not sure where that money ends up being spent. Yes, that’s judgmental because I worry about not being approving of it if I knew. But I’ll firmly defend that with it’s my money and I’ll do with I want with it. I might note, though, that I am just as judgmental towards giving money to bigger charities that do things like hosts lavish celebration parties they reached their goals, or pay their CEOs exorbitant salaries in the eyes of most.

All that judgment doesn’t mean I don’t give to others. I just take a different approach than most, one that requires more work, to know or plan on how to spend that money in ways I approve of. I work hard for it and save it, and I’m not about to give it away so people can become reckless with it, possibly even harming themselves rather than helping that thwarts my good intentions in the first place. If good intentions were bricks on the road to Hell, then I’ll make sure I lay them, not have others lay them on my behalf, thank you very much!

Continue reading

What Science Says about Becoming Happier, a Presentation

I recently completed two courses on the science of happiness. The first was the Science of Well-being course from Yale, on Coursera, offered by Professor Laurie Santos. The second was the Science of Happiness offered by the UC Berkeley on their edX platform. From those two courses that were fairly complementary, I have put together a presentation not just on the science of happiness, but what it says to help you become happier, that summarizes the content of the courses, for which there was plenty! Links on the side of each slide lets you access much more information than the practical aspects I touch upon for this to be useful. While the courses are about the science of happiness, their content is geared towards making the learner happier, and that is lens through which I am presenting it. The science on its own isn’t terribly great if you don’t or can’t use it for something good, right?

Below is the presentation in 3 formats, pending how you want to view them.

Continue reading

My Bed Time Alarm (Final Assignment for Science of Well-Being Course

The final assignment for the Science of Well-being course required students to try and develop a week long rewirement assignment into a habit over 4 weeks, then write about it. This need not be a daily habit, as that might take about 3 months from other research, but something done at least periodically each week. The quest for habit development is so that it becomes second nature. Consciously pursuing happiness all the time will drive you crazy, or at least neurotic, as other research has shown that was not mentioned in this course. I confirmed my thoughts on this from content in the free, 10-week course on the Science of Happiness offered by the UC Berkeley on their edX platform that is much more in-depth than this one, but may not as good as this Science of Well-being course for those just wanting a practical overview of the subject matter.

Below is the assignment I submitted. The Bed Time Alarm idea was described briefly in a previous post that talked about the handful of other rewirements I have actually embraced into my life as habits. I had been doing some of them already, or didn’t find them hard to embrace. However, there is a lot more details here, including rationale and measurements, which all good goals should contain to determine progress and/or success.

With this assignment, I have finally completed the course… and happier for it! Yay!

I would HIGHLY RECOMMEND this course to anybody who cares about their happiness and wants to become happier. A slightly more detailed review is here, plus you can view my posts about the course to see what else was done and how it impacted me, along with other thoughts.

Continue reading