Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Assessment

The Positive And Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) gives you an idea of your natural mix of happiness and unhappiness by measuring one’s general levels of positive and negative mood — or affect — and whether you tend to experience higher or lower positive and negative emotional states than average. There is neither “right” or “wrong” outcome, nor “best” or “worse”. Each outcome has its advantages and drawbacks. Knowing your mix will allow you, if you so choose, to best use it for effect and impact pending a situation and the way you tend to be.

To take the assessment, find a time when you feel relatively neutral about life, and not when you are more stressed or happy than normal. Then answer 20 questions about how deeply you feel a series of emotions.

Answer in general, or on average not at this very moment. Use the text below or this PDF if you’d like to do it on a printout.

 

You have five possible answers for each emotion:

  • 1 = very slightly or not at all
  • 2 = a little
  • 3 = moderately
  • 4 = quite a bit
  • 5 = extremely

 

Assign the scores above to the following 20 emotions:

1. Interested _______

2. Distressed _______

3. Excited _______

4. Upset _______

5. Strong _______

6. Guilty _______

7. Scared _______

8. Hostile _______

9. Enthusiastic _______

10. Proud _______

11. Irritable _______

12. Alert _______

13. Ashamed _______

14. Inspired _______

15. Nervous _______

16. Determined _______

17. Attentive _______

18. Jittery _______

19. Active _______

20. Afraid _______

 

 

Tallying results

  • Calculate your positive affect by summing your scores for questions 1, 3, 5, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, 17, and 19.
  • Calculate your negative affect by summing your scores for questions 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 11, 13, 15, 18, and 20.

 

Which PANAS type are you?

Remember, there is neither “right” or “wrong” outcome, nor “best” or “worse”. Each outcome has its advantages and drawbacks. Knowing your mix will allow you, if you so choose, to best use it for effect and impact pending a situation and the way you tend to be.

Unless you are the highly unusual person who is right at the average on both positive (33.3) and negative (about 17.4), you will fall into one of four quadrants.

  1. If you have above-average positive affect (>33.3) and above-average negative affect (>17.4),
    you’re a “Mad Scientist” who is always spun up about something.
  2. If you’re above-average positive (>33.3) and below-average negative (<17.4),
    you’re a “Cheerleader” who celebrate the good in everything and don’t dwell on the bad.
  3. If you’re below-average positive (<33.3) and above-average negative (>17.4),
    you’re a “Poet” who has trouble enjoying good things, but know when there’s a threat lurking.
  4. If you’re below-average positive (< 33.3) and below-average negative (<17.4),
    you’re a “Judge” who is sober and cool about everything.

 

Further interpreting the results

While there is no “best” or “worst”, “good” or “bad”, “right” or “wrong” PANAS type to be, you may doubt that or wish you were another type you perceive to be “better”. There is no easy way to possibly convince you otherwise, but perhaps an example of why it is bad if everyone were each type would convince you why all four types are needed, and quite possibly equally.

  • If everyone were a Cheerleader and only saw the bright side of everything, we’d keep making the same mistakes repeatedly, which would be awful.
  • Judges, meanwhile, keep us safe from what unrestrained and endless impulsivity may sometimes, or ultimately, lead to.
  • Poets keep us alert to threats, even if everything might seem like a threat at times when some aren’t and would just slow down progress or prevent it all together.
  • Finally, Mad Scientists keep life interesting by making everything grandiose, good and bad, when a lot, if not most things, clearly aren’t.

Every PANAS type has its advantages and disadvantages for all and each situation. Part of knowing your PANAS type is to know where you might fit best or be able to use your PANAS strengths best, and to avoid circumstances where your PANAS type isn’t naturally suited as it’d be more work, and more risk of negative outcomes, to achieve the level of goodness for outcomes in circumstances where your PANAS type belongs more naturally.

 

More information

You can find more information on the PANAS, outcomes, meaning, and use, on these sites and pages within them:

Fundamentally Shifting from Covering for my Weaknesses to Exploiting my Strengths

Growing up as an ethnic minority person, it was easy for others to point to my weaknesses, or just a relevant one, to support some claim or thought they had that I was inferior. Sometimes it felt as if whatever they pointed out, to them, was either the only thing that mattered, or mattered so much it should be the only thing that mattered, or as if nobody else had a weakness, or that particular weakness. I also didn’t like the idea of having very visible, obvious and/or very weak weaknesses. I might have even bought into the mentality of those who isolated my weaknesses in thinking I were like a chain, where I’d only be as strong as my weakest link… though I thought they were, too! 😉

Continue reading

The Three Kinds of Happiness… and the Two that Last

The TEDTalk 2004 video below by positive psychologist Martin Seligman is, by far, the best explanation of happiness in everyday language, but backed by science, that I have ever seen. Using what I’ve learned, I was able to rationalize why I’m generally such a happy camper despite not having some of the elements people deem to contribute most to happiness in life, like love from a partner, kids, even pets, pleasures from alcohol, drugs, gambling, even coffee, etc. For my own reference, I’ll summarize the video below before writing out my deductions that led to conclusions just mentioned about my life, but also reflect on the happiness and lifestyles content mentioned in the video from other developments in positive psychology since the video I have learned. I would highly recommend watching the video, though. Start from 2m 45s if you just want the core of what I am talking about as it’s a bit slow to start before it gets really fascinating!

Continue reading