About these ads

Tag Archive: need


There was a new book recently published called The KidDictionary: Words Parents Need to Describe Their Kids, by Eric Ruhalter, which I thought was cute. Basically, it mashes some words together to make new words which Parents and others might find useful when talking about their kids, or maybe to their kids. Below are some examples I found on a variety of websites so some are not in the book, for sure, but user contributions to the same theme.

There are a lot of words here. Some aren’t too great but others are just priceless. I would suggest picking out a few favourites you know you could use, or tell stories about, and gradually adapt them into your daily language use. Then pick up some more in repeating the pattern.

Got any interesting words to share? I’ve got one at the end, hehehe. Enjoy!

APOLOGUISE (v.)
To force your kid to say they’re sorry, despite how worthless and insincere the apology will be.

ARITHMATRIX (n.)
Point at which your child’s math assignments surpass your math ability.

ASSPLOSION (n.)
When a diaper overflows, requiring the throwing out of whatever outfit the child was wearing.

BLUBBERISH (n.)
Incomprehensible breathless stammering of crying child trying to tell what happened to them.

BOOTALITY (n.)
A child’s notion that “keep your hands to yourself” does not preclude them from kicking someone.

CARDBOREDOM (n.)
Child’s tendency to ignore a new toy and instead play w/ box it came in.

CENSURF (n.)
To extra-quickly change channel when kids r in room & inappropriate scene comes on.

CHAP-TURKEY (n.)
Parent who gets caught skipping pages in long kids book

CHAPTURN (v.)
To sneakily skip pages in a long kids book to get through it faster.

CHEESE AND RICE (n.)
Kidspeak for Jesus Christ, whether in religious or swearing bail-out context… or for the atheist or agnostic family when your kids come home and asks about Jesus Christ.

CHEEZRECK (v.)
To ruin an overpriced school picture by making a silly face.

CHINA SYNDROME (n.)
Kid’s dire need to drink only from 1 special cup or eat off 1 special plate.

CLANDESDINE (v.)
To hide from kids while eating a treat so they won’t ask for one too.

DEFRAMATION (n.)
Sharp decline in the number of photos taken of the second child compared to the first.

DETASTE (v.)
When a kid hates a food they have never tried.

DISCOOLIFICATION (n.)
Parent’s gradual transformation from kids hero to kids greatest source of embarrassment.

DISSUCTION (n.)
The act of sifting through a vacuum cleaner bag to rescue a toy that got sucked up.

DOMESTIC VIOLATION (n.)
The potentially lethal mistake of referring to a stay-at-home mom as someone who “does not work.”

DRINKLE (n.)
Liquid burst emitted from little straw when kid grips his juice box too tightly.

ERRADICRAP (v.)
To purge playroom of old kids’ toys when they’re not around to stop you.

FLOORCLOSE (v.)
To obstruct family room’s main thoroughfare with a shoddily-constructed tower of blocks.

FRIENDSOMNIA (n.)
Lack of sleep that takes place during a “Sleepover”.

GARBOFLAGE (n.)
To hide a piece of your child’s artwork under other trash in the wastebasket so they don’t catch you throwing it away.

GROW-FOOD (n.)
Healthy food. See no-grow-food for opposite.

HARRASK (v.)
To ask the same question over and over again with hopes that answer will change from no to yes.

HOARDGAME (n.)
Long-neglected plaything a child develops interest in when mom says she’s going to get rid of it.

HYPOCRITICIZE (v.)
To yell at your kids to keep their voices down.

KEDTUSIONS (n.)
Kicks to the face sustained while trying to tie a toddler’s shoes.

KIDDLES (n.)
Crumbs & debris found on your car’s upholstery when u remove a car seat.

KUNCKLET (n.)
Baby on an endless quest to stuff their entire fist in her mouth.

IMPOLERT (n.)
A child’s indiscreet public call of attention to a stranger’s physical abnormality.

INPLAYTIABLE (adj.)
Filled w/ desire to own every toy advertised on TV.

INTOILANCE (n.)
A child’s need to go to the bathroom at the least opportune time.

INVISIBOOBOO (n.)
Place on kids body you unnecessarily put a band-aid when they got hurt but didn’t bleed.

JINGLEBERRY (n.)
Holiday song wh/ lyrics altered to incorporate potty talk or other themes contrary to the season celebrate.

KIDDLES (n.)
The volume of gunk and crumbs and litter and debris you collect from having and raising a kid.

KODICK (n.)
Kid who won’t cooperate for the family photo.

LEAD OFFENSIVE (n.)
Stampede of children all trying to be the first in line to do something.

LIBRIDO (n.)
A man’s disdain for literature about parenting.

LULLABYE-BYE (n.)
Process of sneaking from the bed of toddler who makes you lay down w/ them at night.

LULLACRY (n.)
Dramatic pause between a child getting hurt and beginning to wail.

MACOUSTICS (n.)
The pitch of a mother’s voice that her children find so easy to ignore.

MADDRESS (v.)
To refer to kid by 1st & middle name because he’s trouble.

MALLOWMINE (v.)
To eat only the marshmallows in Lucky Charms.

MISCROSS (v.)
To fail to look both ways til you’re halfway across the street.

MOISTRATION (n.)
Nausea you feel when u eat piece of food from kids plate & learn it’s already been chewed.

MONOPOLOOZE (v.)
To intentionally lose board game to unsportsmanlike child.

MUNCHKISS (v.)
To eat the icing off a donut and then put it back.

NICKTRONIZE (v.)
To feign belief in Santa Claus w/ hopes of bigger Christmas payload.

NIGHTCAPPETITE (n.)
“Sudden Hunger” portion of child’s bedtime procrastination ritual.

NODOZER (n.)
Child who falls asleep in stroller or car but springs awake when u move them to crib.

NO-GROW-FOOD (n.)
Junk food/candy. See  grow-food for opposite.

ORTHODONTREPRENEUR (n.)
A child who is interested in knocking his own teeth out in the interest of a hefty payday from the Tooth Fairy.

PEEQUEL (n.)
Child’s need to use bathroom 10 min after leaving rest stop where they didn’t have to go.

PHANTOMOLITION (v.)
When something gets broken but no one did it.

PILLOWJACKER (n.)
A child who manages to weasel their way into parents bed.

POLUTENESS (n.)
Kid’s ability to say “please” “thank you” &“I’m sorry” w/o the slightest trace of sincerity.

POTTYSITTING (n.)
The act of taking your baby/toddler into the bathroom with you so you can do your “business” and watch the kid at the same time.

PUPPYMOON (n.)
Brief period where kids live up to promise of caring for pet they begged you for.

REGURGITIGHTEN (v.)
To brace one’s self upon realizing that your kid is about to barf on you.

REMASKULATE (n.)
To change your mind about what you want to be for Halloween many times during October.

SCHWINCIDENT (n)
When a bike is left on the ground behind a car in driveway.

SCOOZER (n.)
Child who only has something to say to you when you’re on the phone or in the shower.

SCREWPLE (v.)
To instantaneously cease & conceal sexual activity when a kid barges in.

SHKOFF (v.)
To remove one’s shoes w/o untying the laces.

SHRAM (v.)
To try to put on sneakers with laces still tied from last time they were worn.

SIBROIDERY (n.)
Article of hand-me-down clothing w/ the older sibling’s name or initials on it.

SNOOT (v.)
To suck in, rather than blow out, when you’re blowing your nose.

SPOONAMI (adj.)
State of silverware after letting 3 y.o. empty dishwasher cutlery basket.

STINKIN’ THINKIN’ (n.)
Negative words like stupid, ugly, dumb, hate or all swear words.

STOCKTEASE (n.)
Kid who lets u buy a ton of their favorite food and then decides they don’t like it anymore.

SWAN LEAK (n.)
When your daughter pees herself during her ballet performance.

TANGLETT (n.)
Impossible knots left in laces by kid newly learning to tie shoes.

THRILLEVATE (v.)
To stand on tippy toes to appear tall enough to go on a ride u r too short for.

THUMBLE (v.)
To speak incoherently with ones fingers in their mouth.

TRANSPORTOT (v.)
Attempt to move a sleeping toddler from car seat to be w/o waking them.

TWIRPLE (n.)
When kid playing TBall makes it to 3rd base on hit that doesn’t get out of infield.

UPTITUDE (n.)
The intense desire to be the one who presses the button in an elevator.

TOYPHOON (n.)
Routine recreational activities of children that leave their playroom looking like it was struck by a hurricane.

VACCINEMINEM (n.)
The candy reward given to a child for being brave while getting his shots.

WASPTUSI (n.)
The frantic dance of a kid trying to elude a bee.

WETSOXITY (n.)
Magnetic-like force that draws kids without boots on into puddles.

WHYARRHEA (n.)
A child’s string of questions rattled off in rapid-fire succession.

WOOJEE WOOJEE (n.)
To wash (like your hands) or rub in harder (as in sunscreen).

WOUNDOGGLE (n.)
When a child pretends to be hurt after hurting someone else with hopes that it will prevent him or her from getting in trouble.

XOX (pronounced zocks) (v.)
To intentionally lose a game of Tic Tac Toe to a little kid.

YUPPING (v.)
The act of pretending to understand what your yammering 2 y.o. is saying to you.

.

Hmmm… can I add one?

SHITAKE (pronounced shitACKy) (n. or v.)
- Swear word slur when you realize your kid heard the first syllable.
- Then the need to go for a No. 2 loo, as in Johnny needs a shitake or Mommy, I need to shitake, when you kid asks what shitake means… like they always do when they hear words they don’t know.

Care to share a word?

About these ads

Share/Save/Bookmark

.

Book and Theory Background

Daniel J. Levitin wrote an absolutely brilliant book called The World in Six Songs, supported by a great website with the many music samples referenced, among other great related material.

My basic paraphrasing of the concept is this. All the songs in the world could be fit into at least one of six categories providing an evolutionary benefit to humanity, often ultimately tied to our social nature.

The book and website offer far more detailed interpretations, of course, but I will expand on my paraphrasing with each post and the associated topic.

Daniel J. Levitin and The World in Six SongsIn a series of posts, I will describe each of the six categories in brief, one at a time:

  1. Friendship
  2. Joy
  3. Comfort
  4. Knowledge
  5. Religion
  6. Love

I will describe what the categories are about because they are not as limited in scope as the category names suggest. I will then supply one of my choices and ask all readers to do the same if they so wish. In the seventh post of the series, I will offer the chance to put the song choices all together so readers can read the entire set on one post. I do this because it would be a long post to describe all six categories at once, but to have all the answers in one place might be nice.

.

This post focuses on Songs of Love

July 30th add-on in italics, from Dan Levitin in a summary article
Love songs serve as an expression of emotion, commitment, and honesty. They play a role in mating and bonding. Love provides an evolutionary advantage because it is altruistic, and corresponds with commitment, which leads to better care of children, which is an obvious fitness advantage. With altruism, the greater good comes before the individual, strengthening infrastructure.

Some may question whether there would be much to say in this chapter because intuitively, I don’t think anybody would say they couldn’t name a “love song”. But that’s a love song in their definition, or a romantic love song, not a song of love as Daniel defined it, backed up by some very prominent names. Indeed, the chapter opens with a quote by Frank Zappa that says “Romantic love songs are a sham that perpetuate a lie on unsuspecting young kids”.

Somehow, I don’t think it stops at young kids.

Frank further follows up with “I think one of the causes of bad mental health in the United States is that people have been raised on ‘love lyrics’.”

Polar opposite Joni Mitchell then jumps in to agree with “There’s no such thing as romantic love. It was a myth invented in ancient Sumeria, repopularized in the Middle Ages, and one that is clearly not true. Romantic love is all about ‘I’ this and ‘I’ that. But true love is about ‘other’.”

And if I were anybody, I’d have jumped in to agree, but I’ll just have to agree on my blog. Songs of love by Daniel Levitin’s theory, and in the purest sense of the word, are about intense feelings for another of any kind. That could be parental, friends, god (no caps on purpose), country, idea, etc. It is about something external and bigger than the self, and bigger than even we, never mind just me, like so many love songs are often about. And it is this something bigger and external to the self, the ideals we have in many aspects of life that develops pillars in our lives and society, that help create the social structure necessary for society and raising children (along the same belief that it takes a village to raise a child).

A note should be added here to clarify that while religion is also about something bigger and external to the self, it is about a search for meaning. Love songs are about the motivation and the doing, without that greater meaning of placement, using the something greater towards creating a favourable social architecture for increasing our chances of survival and evolution.

As for how romantic love songs fits into all of this, they are just a smidgeon of songs of love, and likewise, romantic love of love in the greater sense. The world is full of bad love songs, then, if you think of romantic love songs as representatives of the love song category, for the most part. They are still important, but think of it as strength in numbers rather than true strength within for the few. Many romantic love songs are just for the here and now, to get us there and hold us a bit until either another one comes along or something else comes along to help us. I don’t mean their popularity on the charts, but rather their relevance to us for a moment. They are also an “honest” signal harder to fake than language because it’s harder to hide an emotion via a song than in speaking a phrase. By the way, keep in mind we have only had recording devices to use songs the way we do today in about 0.0001% of our evolutionary history, so the honest signal theory  that we sang the songs ourselves to communicate, comparing to speech to say something, applies well to our history. Most of our ancestors could not request or play a song for someone like we can today.

To defend his point that romantic love is just a tiny part of love in the bigger sense, Daniel Levitin presented a very compelling physiological and neurological argument of how romantic love is just a chemical high. In contrast, the idea of love being about the “other” and not the self, is what truly drives us to raise our children, who take far longer and far more resources to develop into a self-sustaining adult than any other babies in the animal kingdom. Romantic love songs only use the “conveyance” component of language, the easy one to get to the here and now, not the computational component that is much longer term. Romantic love songs are about the moment, not the long-term future.

Love, in the real sense of the word that is about the “other” and not the self, is easily just as deep as religion, and the chapter shows it with a lot of deep material touching everything from the psychological, physiological, neurological, philosophical, evolutionary and other aspects of love. It is not challenging to read for reading level required, but the ideas will take time to think about and absorb if you read it seriously. Religion only seems deeper because of its theoretical boundlessness, and because simple romantic love songs have made love seem so trivial. However, I don’t think anybody would disagree that love is what ultimately binds us all together most, and to that end, the Beatles may well have been right that all you need is love. Well, maybe not all as life might still be difficult if that was all you had, but for sure, love is the most imporant thing we need.

Audio sample of songs from the Love chapter in The World in Six Songs can be found on the website. No direct link was available, but click on the Songs menu option and appropriate page number range link carrying pages 229 to 289. Please note that not all songs are meant as samples of Love songs. Some are just referenced material in the book text.

.

Author Daniel Levitin chose

Bring ‘Em All In, by the Waterboys, not just as an example of a love song suitable to his theory, but also as the ultimate love song to fit the example (lyrics).

.

My choice for Song of Love is

We are the World, written by Michael Jackson and performed by a collective of artists (listed with lyrics).

Of the many songs I love as love songs, all are of the romantic love song nature that is but a petty part of the songs of love defined by Daniel Levitin in his World in Six Songs theory. It is really tough to think of a song that unites us all in a caring cause, for the future as much as now. However, I think this one does pretty well, talking about the world, the children, in a call to action (now) for a brighter day (future). I am just very saddened listening to it to see how far Michael Jackson has fallen from a pop star with the often cited Greatest Album of All Time in Thriller (MTV, even in Apr 2009), to someone who could write a song as this, to what he is now.

.

What is your choice for Song of Love?

Please leave your choice as a comment.

Lyrics and YouTube/audio link would greatly enhance your answer so readers can know more about your choice. They are not necessary, though, and not possible if no lyrics or version exist.

You can include songs you wrote as a choice, too!

Flesch-Kincaid Grade Reading Level: 10.1

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 195 other followers

%d bloggers like this: